green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.6 score
“lawson's complaint also alleges that fortner and investigator davis violated lawson's rights by conspiring to incarcerate him. if proved, these conspiracy claims would also call his conviction into question.”
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Krikie v. State of Texas
lawson's complaint also alleges that fortner and investigator davis violated lawson's rights by conspiring to incarcerate him. if proved, these conspiracy claims would call his conviction into question.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Garig v. Travis
lawson's complaint also alleges that fortner and investigator davis violated lawson's rights by conspiring to incarcerate him. if proved, these conspiracy claims would also call his conviction into question.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Moore v. Circle K Stores, Inc.
Doc. 14-4. 44 See Shackelford v. Deloitte & Touche, L.L.P., 190 F.3d 398, 409 (5th Cir. 1999). 45 Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., 530 U.S. 133, 150 (2000). 46 Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986). 47 Carriere v. Chandeleur Energy, 42 F.3d 642 , 1994 WL 708709, at *6 (5th Cir. 1994). brought by employees.48 The Act expressly provides that the worker’s compensation scheme “shall be exclusive over all other rights, remedies, and claims for damages…as against his employer, or any principal or any officer, director, stockholder, partner, or employee of such employer…
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Ellis v. Trustmark Builders, Inc.
Carriere v. Chandeleur Energy Corp., No. 94-40119, 1994 WL 708709, at *4 (5th Cir. Dec.9, 1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Monty J. Degruise v. Sprint Corporation, Sprint Corporation
See Lawrence v. Jackson Mack Sales, Inc., 837 F.Supp. 771, 782 (S.D.Miss.1992), ("Methods of notification which are reasonably calculated to reach the employee or beneficiary are considered to conform to the standard of good faith compliance with the statute.”), aff'd 42 F.3d 642 (5th Cir.1994); Myers v. King’s Daughters Clinic, 912 F.Supp. 233, 236 (W.D.Tex.1996) (same), aff’d 96 F.3d 1445 (5th Cir.1996); see also Bryant v. Food Lion, Inc., 100 F.Supp.2d 346, 367 (D.S.C.2000) (same), aff’d 2001 WL 434566 (4th Cir. Apr. 30, 2001); Keegan v. Bloomingdale’s, Inc., 992 F.Supp. 974, 977 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Olexy v. Interstate Assurance Co.
See Lawrence v. Jackson Mack Sales, Inc., 837 F.Supp. 771, 779 (S.D.Miss.1992), aff'd, 42 F.3d 642 (5th Cir.1992) (claims accruing prior to filing of bankruptcy petition become property of estate and “may only be prosecuted by the trustee of the bankruptcy estate, the real, party in interest under Rule 17(a)”). 1 For his part, plaintiff acknowledges that the trustee may have an interest, and suggests that while the trustee should perhaps be joined as a party plaintiff, plaintiff should be permitted to remain a party.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Keegan v. Bloomingdale's, Inc.
Jachim v. KUTV Inc., 783 F.Supp. 1328, 1333-34 (D.Utah 1992); see also Lawrence v. Jackson Mack Sales, Inc., 837 F.Supp. 771, 783 (S.D.Miss.1992) (sharing the “view of the Jachim court that § 1166 does not require proof that the notices required by that section be received” and limiting its “consideration of the proof solely to the question of whether there is a genuine issue of material fact concerning [the defendant’s] assertion that the notice was mailed.”), aff'd, 42 F.3d 642 (5th Cir.1994); Myers v. King’s Daughters Clinic, 912 F.Supp. 233, 236 (W.D.Tex.1996) (agreeing with t…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carriere
v.
Chandeleur Energy
NO. 94-40119
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Dec 09, 1994
Appeal From: W.D.La., No. 92-CV-1111
1
AFFIRMED.