Halford v. Wright, 531 S.E.2d 213 (N.C. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Halford v. Wright, 531 S.E.2d 213 (N.C. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Devalle v. N.C. Sheriffs' Educ. & Training Standards Comm'n (nc, 2025-08-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Devalle v. N.C. Sheriffs' Educ. & Training Standards Comm'n (2×)
N.C. · 2025 · confidence medium
SHERIFFS’ EDUC. & TRAINING STANDARDS COMM’N Opinion of the Court S.E.2d 815, 819 (2015) (“Testimony that is contradictory, inconsistent, or inherently incredible is a sufficient basis upon which to deny admission on character grounds.” (quoting In re Braun, 352 N.C. 327, 335 , 531 S.E.2d 213, 218 (2000))).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Watkins v. North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners (2×) also: Cited "see"
N.C. Ct. App. · 2003 · confidence medium
In re Braun, 352 N.C. 327, 332 , 531 S.E.2d 213, 217 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" Martini v. Companion Property & Casualty Insurance
N.C. Ct. App. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tew v. Brown, 135 N.C.App. 763, 767 , 522 S.E.2d 127, 130 (1999) ("[T]he trial court may not consider an unverified pleading when ruling on a motion for summary judgment." (citations omitted)), disc. review improvidently allowed, 352 N.C. 145 , 531 S.E.2d 213 (2000); Venture Properties I v. Anderson, 120 N.C.App. 852, 855 , 463 S.E.2d 795, 797 (1995) (holding that "[s]ince [the] defendant's pleadings were unverified, the trial court acted properly in refusing to consider them" when granting the plaintiff summary judgment (citations omitted)), disc. review denied, 342 N.C. 898 , 467 S.E.2d …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
JUDY W. HALFORD
v.
CORA WRIGHT
No. 557A99.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jun 16, 2000.
531 S.E.2d 213
2000 N.C. LEXIS 442
Deaton & Biggers, P.L.L.C., by W. Robinson Deaton, Jr. and Lydia A. Hoza, for plaintiff-appellee. , Stott, Hollowell, Palmer & Windham, L.L.P., by Martha Raymond Thompson, for defendant-appellant. , Hedrick, Eatman, Gardner & Kincheloe, L.L.P., by Allen C. Smith and Colleen M. Crowley, on behalf of the North Carolina Association of Defense Attorneys, amicus curiae.
Published
PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion by Judge Greene, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Superior Court, Rutherford County, for proceedings not inconsistent with the dissenting opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.