Lehmkuhl v. Owners Ins., 623 N.E.2d 1184 (Ohio 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Lehmkuhl v. Owners Ins., 623 N.E.2d 1184 (Ohio 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lehmkuhl, Admr.
v.
Owners Insurance Company
No. 93-577.
Ohio Supreme Court.
Dec 29, 1993.
623 N.E.2d 1184
Peeler, McGary & Zopjf, Robert W. Peeler and Carolyn A Potter, for appellant., Freund, Freeze & Arnold and Gordon D. Arnold; and Thomas B. Bruns, for appellee.
Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Lead Opinion

Pursuant to Savoie v. Grange Mut. Ins. Co. (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 500, 620 N.E.2d 809, the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Clermont County is reversed.

AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. [*94] Moyer, C.J., concurs separately. Wright, J., dissents.

Concurrence

Moyer, C.J.,

concurring separately. I concur separately in the judgment entry in the above-styled case. As my dissent in Savoie v. Grange Mut Ins. Co. (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 500, 620 N.E.2d 809, stated, I do not agree with the law announced in the majority decision. Nevertheless, it is the law on the issue in the above-styled case. As I believe all parties should receive equal application of the law announced by this court, and only for that reason, I concur in the judgment entry.

Dissent

Wright, J.,

dissenting. I must dissent in continuing protest to the majority’s sundry holdings in Savoie v. Grange Mut. Ins. Co. (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 500, 620 N.E.2d 809. As stated in the dissent in Savoie, that holding lacks sound reasoning, reverses ten years of established case law and flouts the will of the General Assembly. Thus, I feel compelled to remain in this posture until the General Assembly has had the opportunity to undo the damage caused to the public by this unfortunate, result-oriented decision.