green
Positive treatment
Issue: written work ruleOH ↗
Issue: voluntary abandonment doctrineOH ↗
Issue: employee violationOH ↗
Issue: work ruleOH ↗
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.0 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Schaffer v. Ohio State Univ.
it is the responsibility of the person who wishes to inspect and/or copy records to identify with reasonable clarity the records at issue
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Vista International Hotel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Daniels)
Watts v. Schottenstein Stores Corp., 68 Ohio St.3d 118 , 623 N.E.2d 1202, 1205 (1993)(noting that a claimant's discharge for cause does not automatically preclude wage loss benefits); Wendt v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau, 467 N.W.2d 720, 728 (N.D.1991)(same); Cousins v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 599 A.2d 73, 74 (Me.1991)(same); Gilmer v. Atlanta Housing Auth., 170 Ga.App. 326 , 316 S.E.2d 535, 536 (1984)(finding that a claimant discharged for cause was entitled to receive benefits for his loss of earnings capacity to the extent that he could prove that he was unable to work because o…
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Hudson v. Horseshoe Club Operating Co.
Watts v. Schottenstein Stores, 623 N.E.2d 1202, 1205 (Ohio 1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The State ex rel. May
v.
Hendon, Judge
v.
Hendon, Judge
No. 93-1118.
Ohio Supreme Court.
Dec 29, 1993.
Morris May, pro se.
Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright.
Published
Citer courts: Ohio Court of Claims (1)
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.