State v. Thrower, 643 N.E.2d 1149 (Ohio 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Thrower, 643 N.E.2d 1149 (Ohio 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The State of Ohio
v.
Thrower
No. 94-1983.
Ohio Supreme Court.
Dec 30, 1994.
643 N.E.2d 1149
1994 Ohio LEXIS 2931
Albert D. Thrower, pro se.
Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Per Curiam.

On appeal, appellant argues that the good-cause requirement denies him due process of law because he had no notice of the ninety-day filing requirement. We reject this argument and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Appellant is not entitled to special notice of changes in the law.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.