Federated Mut. Ins. v. Motorists Mut. Ins., 654 N.E.2d 990 (Ohio 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Federated Mut. Ins. v. Motorists Mut. Ins., 654 N.E.2d 990 (Ohio 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: US Bank National Assn. v. Collier, 08ap-207 (12-23-2008) (ohioctapp, 2008-12-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" US Bank National Assn. v. Collier, 08ap-207 (12-23-2008)
Ohio Ct. App. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wray v. Parsson (1995), 101 Ohio App.3d 514 , 518 , appeal not allowed, 73 Ohio St.3d 1413 , reconsideration denied, 73 Ohio St.3d 1455 (observing that an appellant bears the burden of affirmatively demonstrating error on appeal, and an appellant has the responsibility of providing an appellate court with a record of facts, testimony, and evidentiary matters that are necessary to support an appellant's assignment of error); see, also, Cook v. Mozer (1923), 108 Ohio St. 30 , syllabus (holding that "[t]he doctrine of lis pendens has long been established and recognized as the general law of …
discussed Cited "see" State v. Hill, 07ap-889 (8-21-2008)
Ohio Ct. App. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See, generally, State v. Miley (1996), 114 Ohio App.3d 738 , 742 (Harsha, J., concurring in judgment only), appeal not allowed (1997), 77 Ohio St.3d 1548 , citing State v. Misch (1995), 101 Ohio App.3d 640 , 650 , dismissed, appeal not allowed, 73 Ohio St.3d 1410 , reconsideration denied, 73 Ohio St.3d 1455 ; State v. Beehive Ltd.
discussed Cited "see" Webb v. Grafton Correctional Inst., Unpublished Decision (7-15-2004)
Ohio Ct. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wray v. Parsson (1995), 101 Ohio App.3d 514 , 518 , appeal not allowed, 73 Ohio St.3d 1413 , reconsideration denied, 73 Ohio St.3d 1455 ("[i]t is fundamental that the appellant bears the burden of affirmatively demonstrating error on appeal. * * * Appellant also has the responsibility of providing the reviewing court with a record of the facts, testimony, and evidentiary matters which are necessary to support the appellant's assignments of error"). {¶ 21} Accordingly, we overrule plaintiff's third assignment of error. {¶ 22} Plaintiff's fourth assignment of error asserts the trial court'…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Federated Mut. Ins. Co.
v.
Motorists Mut. Ins. Co.
95-875; No. 10-95-3.
Ohio Supreme Court.
Sep 20, 1995.
654 N.E.2d 990
1995 Ohio LEXIS 1898
Published

Reported at 73 Ohio St.3d 1411, 651 N.E.2d 1309. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.