State v. Doles, 665 N.E.2d 197 (Ohio 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Doles, 665 N.E.2d 197 (Ohio 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 2016–2017 · …a sworn statement of the basis for the claim that appellate counsel's representation was deficient. ⚠ not in text
6 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Clark v. Buchanan (ohnd, 2020-11-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Clark v. Buchanan
N.D. Ohio · 2020 · confidence medium
That rule “mandates that the applicant must attach to the application for reopening ‘a sworn statement of the basis for the claim that appellate counsel's representation was deficient.’” Ohio v. Clark, 2017 WL 242006 , *3 (Ohio Ct. App. Jan. 18, 2017) (quoting Ohio v. Doles, 665 N.E.2d 197, 198 (Ohio 1996)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The State of Ohio
v.
Doles
No. 96-134.
Ohio Supreme Court.
Jun 19, 1996.
665 N.E.2d 197
Michael M. Ater, Ross County Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee., Johnston & Gleeson and Lorene G. Johnston, for appellant.
Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in its decision. See, also, State v. Peeples (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 149, 652 N.E.2d 717; State v. Cheren (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 138, 652 N.E.2d 708.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.