State ex rel. Bruggeman v. Leonard, 714 N.E.2d 921 (Ohio 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
State ex rel. Bruggeman v. Leonard, 714 N.E.2d 921 (Ohio 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 2 distinct cases, 2003–2020 · 2 courts · …habeas corpus will not issue to raise claims of insufficiency of evidence ✓
11 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Perry v. Greene (ohioctapp, 2020-01-31)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Perry v. Greene (2×)
Ohio Ct. App. · 2020 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
habeas corpus will not issue to raise claims of insufficiency of evidence
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The State ex rel. Bruggeman
v.
Leonard, Warden
No. 99-456.
Ohio Supreme Court.
Sep 1, 1999.
714 N.E.2d 921
Christopher Bruggeman, pro se. , Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Laurence R. Snyder, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney.
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 82%
Citer courts: Ohio Court of Appeals (2)
Per Curiam.

Bruggeman asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his petition and assessing costs against him. For the following reasons, Bruggeman’s contentions lack merit.

Habeas corpus will not issue to raise claims of insufficiency of evidence or erroneous jury instructions. See, e.g., Cornell v. Schotten (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 466, 467, 633 N.E.2d 1111, 1112; State ex rel. Beaver v. Konteh (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 519, 521, 700 N.E.2d 1256, 1258.

Further, the court of appeals did not err in assessing costs against Bruggeman. Contrary to his contentions, he was not the prevailing party in his habeas corpus case, and the court of appeals could have properly determined that, based on the account statement submitted by the prison cashier, he had sufficient funds to make periodic partial payments of the assessed costs.

Based on the foregoing, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.