State v. York, 789 N.E.2d 231 (Ohio 2003). · Go Syfert
State v. York, 789 N.E.2d 231 (Ohio 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
The State of Ohio
v.
York
No. 2002-0767.
Ohio Supreme Court.
Jun 11, 2003.
Published opinion
789 N.E.2d 231
Ken Egbert Jr., Seneca County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
Con, Cook, Moyer, Nor, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney.
Published

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Fisher, 99 Ohio St.3d 127, 2003-Ohio-2761, 789 N.E.2d 222, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals to consider the defendant’s remaining assignments of error.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and O’Con-nor, JJ., concur. Cook, J., not participating.