State v. Crowley, 789 N.E.2d 238 (Ohio 2003). · Go Syfert
State v. Crowley, 789 N.E.2d 238 (Ohio 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The State of Ohio
v.
Crowley
No. 2003-0242.
Ohio Supreme Court.
Jun 11, 2003.
Published opinion
789 N.E.2d 238
Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Jennifer L. Coriell, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee., Donald C. Schumacher, for appellant.
Con, Cook, Moyer, Nor, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney.
Published

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals on the sole proposition of law is affirmed on the authority of State v. Fisher, 99 Ohio St.3d 127, 2003-Ohio-2761, 789 N.E.2d 222.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and O’Con-nor, JJ., concur. Cook, J., not participating.