Disciplinary Couns. v. Baumgartner, 790 N.E.2d 1221 (Ohio 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Disciplinary Couns. v. Baumgartner, 790 N.E.2d 1221 (Ohio 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Disciplinary Counsel
v.
Baumgartner
2002-2237.
Ohio Supreme Court.
Jul 3, 2003.
790 N.E.2d 1221
Published

On June 27, 2003, respondent filed a motion for emergency judicial notice of adjudicative facts and demand for a hearing. Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. IX(9) prohibits the filing of additional briefs or other materials related to the merits of a case after the case has been orally argued,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that respondent’s motion be, and hereby is, stricken.