Stork v. Townsend, 132 F.2d 859 (6th Cir. 1942). · Go Syfert
Search
Stork v. Townsend, 132 F.2d 859 (6th Cir. 1942). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STORK
v.
TOWNSEND
No. 9184.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Dec 10, 1942.
132 F.2d 859
1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 2680
Elmer H. Groefsema, of Detroit, Mich., and Daniel I. Rosenthal, of Dayton, Ohio, for appellant., T. A. Billingsley, of Greenville, Ohio, and I. L. Holderman, of Dayton, Ohio, for appellee.
Allen, Allister, Hamilton.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 68%
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)
PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be 'heard upon the record, briefs, and argument of counsel;

And it appearing that appellant sought damages for fraudulent misrepresentation and for breach of warranty, and that the case was tried to the court without the intervention of a jury; and that the court, which heard numerous witnesses give sharply conflicting testimony, and made written findings of fact and conclusions of law, found that the appellant had failed to-establish the material allegations of his amended complaint by a preponderance of evidence;

And it appearing that this finding is not clearly erroneous Rule 52, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, and no issue other than one of fact being presented:

It is ordered that the judgment be, and it hereby is, affirmed.