green
Positive treatment
1.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Lucas v. Seagrave Corporation
Stores Co., 155 F.2d 521 *348 (9th Cir. 1940), Hackner v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New York, 117 F.2d 95 (2nd Cir. 1941); Mitchell v. Great American Indemnity Co., 87 F.Supp. 961 (W.D.La.1950); compare address by Judge Marvin Frankel, Some Preliminary Observations Concerning Civil Rule 23, Eighth Circuit Judicial Conference, Sept. 18, 1967, at p. 10. 13 In this situation it would seem that jurisdiction of the entire action has been invoked by plaintiffs Lucas’ and Feezer’s satisfaction of the requisite amount and the amount of plaintiff Cable’s claim would not seem critical.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of FIRST NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF EASTON (Sylvia REIBMAN, Intervenor, Appellant)
No. 9091.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
May 27, 1946.
Nathan L. Reibman, of Easton, Pa. (Francis E. Walter, of Easton, Pa., on the brief), for appellant., Allen S. Olmsted, 2d, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Charles D. Hogan, of Easton, Pa., and James M. Kane and Robert A. Dixon, both of Chicago, Ill., on the brief), for petitioner.
Published
PER CURIAM.
The order of the court below, vacating the order of August 22, 1945 granting the appellant Reibman leave to intervene, is affirmed.