Slabinski v. Lippincott, 170 F.2d 1022 (3d Cir. 1948). · Go Syfert
Search
Slabinski v. Lippincott, 170 F.2d 1022 (3d Cir. 1948). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Joseph F. SLABINSKI
v.
Richard J. LIPPINCOTT, Individually and Trading as Lippincott's Express
No. 9659.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Nov 26, 1948.
170 F.2d 1022
Raymond A White, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant., Albert C. Gekoski, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Careful consideration of the points raised by the defendant has convinced us that the question of the plaintiff’s alleged contributory negligence was a matter for the jury to decide. We are of the opinion also that the verdict of the jury in favor of the plaintiff was not capricious, was not against the credible evidence and was in accordance with the adequate charge of the trial court.

Accordingly the judgment appealed from will be affirmed.