Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2014
2020
2026
Cited for
At page 950 discussing “the authority that a legal custodian has to make decisions for the ward1 citing case
- Wyatt B. v. Kotek, 146 F.4th 1267 (9th Cir. 2025).(discussing “the authority that a legal custodian has to make decisions for the ward)
Other citing cases
- Dept. of Human Servs. v. J. L. S., 345 Or. App. 75 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
- State v. Roberts, 436 P.3d 57 (Or. Ct. App. 2019).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
KARUK TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA, a federally recognized organization and Friends of the River Foundation, a California nonprofit organization, on Review
v.
TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON, on Review
v.
TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON, on Review
CC 080202663; CA A139375; SC S059484.
Oregon Supreme Court.
Apr 17, 2014.
Keith M. Garza, Oak Grove, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner on review,, Thomas M. Christ, Cosgrave, Vergeer Kester LLP, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents on review., Erin C. Lagesen, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed a brief for amicus curiae State of Oregon. With her on the brief were John R. Kroger, Attorney General, and Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General., Tracy Pool Reeve, Senior Deputy City Attorney, Portland City Attorney’s Office, filed a brief for amicus curiae League of Oregon Cities.
Baldwin, Balmer, Kistler, Landau, Linder, Walters.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Oregon (2)
PER CURIAM
The decision of the Court of Appeals and the judgment of the circuit court are affirmed by an equally divided court.