Karuk Tribe of California v. Tri-Cnty. Metro. Transp. Dist., 323 P.3d 947 (Or. 2014).
Search
Karuk Tribe of California v. Tri-Cnty. Metro. Transp. Dist., 323 P.3d 947 (Or. 2014). Book View Copy Cite
✓ Positive Treatment Affirmed 1 positive ▼
KARUK TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA, a federally recognized organization and Friends of the River Foundation, a California nonprofit organization, on Review
v.
TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON, on Review
CC 080202663; CA A139375; SC S059484.
Oregon Supreme Court.
Apr 17, 2014.
323 P.3d 947
Keith M. Garza, Oak Grove, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner on review,, Thomas M. Christ, Cosgrave, Vergeer Kester LLP, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents on review., Erin C. Lagesen, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed a brief for amicus curiae State of Oregon. With her on the brief were John R. Kroger, Attorney General, and Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General., Tracy Pool Reeve, Senior Deputy City Attorney, Portland City Attorney’s Office, filed a brief for amicus curiae League of Oregon Cities.
Baldwin, Balmer, Kistler, Landau, Linder, Walters.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM

The decision of the Court of Appeals and the judgment of the circuit court are affirmed by an equally divided court.