Maney v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 150 P.3d 50 (Or. Ct. App. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
Maney v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 150 P.3d 50 (Or. Ct. App. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Paul J. MANEY
v.
BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
A121092.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Dec 27, 2006.
Published opinion
150 P.3d 50
2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1995
Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director, Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Legal Services Division, and Rebecca A. Duncan, Chief Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for petitioner. Paul Julian Maney, filed the supplemental brief pro se., Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Judy C. Lucas, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Landau, Ortega, Schuman.
Published
PER CURIAM

Petitioner was convicted of aggravated murder in 1981 and sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole for a minimum of 20 years. In 2002, petitioner asked for a parole release date. The Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision conducted an aggravated murder review hearing. Following that hearing, the board declined to set a release date, finding that petitioner was unlikely to be rehabilitated within a reasonable period of time. Petitioner now seeks judicial review, arguing that the board erred in failing to conduct the hearing in accordance with the contested case procedures required by ORS 163.105(3). The state concedes that, under Larsen v. Board of Parole, 206 Or App 353, 365, 138 P3d 16 (2006), petitioner is correct. We agree.

Reversed and remanded.