Hayes v. Locus, 76 N.E. 649 (Ind. Ct. App. 1906). · Go Syfert
Hayes v. Locus, 76 N.E. 649 (Ind. Ct. App. 1906). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hayes
v.
Locus
No. 5,460.
Indiana Court of Appeals.
Jan 9, 1906.
Published opinion
76 N.E. 649
1906 Ind. App. LEXIS 16
Willits & Voorhis, for appellants., Bell & Purdum and John L. Bupe, for appellees.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Per Curiam.

This appeal having been dismissed, upon the motion of the appellants, as to all the appellees except the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company, a motion to dismiss the appeal has been presented by that company. In the assignment of errors the specifications are like those which we held to be not sufficient to present any question in Spitzer v. Miller (1905), 35 Ind. App. 116. It is claimed on behalf of the appellants that this motion of the solé remaining appellee to dismiss comes too late, inasmuch as a long period has elapsed since the submission of the cause in this court, and after the time for the filing of a brief for such appellee on the merits; but, the assignment of errors being so defective as not to present any question upon the merits, the appeal upon final hearing would be dismissed by the court without any motion therefor. Therefore there has been no waiver of the right of such appellee to the dismissal.

Appeal dismissed.