Margery A. Morstein v. Nat'l Ins. Servs., Inc. Pan Am. Life Ins. Co. the Shaw Agency Scott Hankins, 81 F.3d 1031 (11th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Margery A. Morstein v. Nat'l Ins. Servs., Inc. Pan Am. Life Ins. Co. the Shaw Agency Scott Hankins, 81 F.3d 1031 (11th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Margery A. Morstein v. National Insurance Services, Inc. Pan American Life Insurance Company the Shaw Agency Scott Hankins (ca11, 1996-08-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Margery A. Morstein v. National Insurance Services, Inc. Pan American Life Insurance Company the Shaw Agency Scott Hankins
11th Cir. · 1996 · confidence medium
The original panel found the facts in this case to be duplicative of the facts in Farlow 3 Id. at 1137.
cited Cited as authority (rule) All Risks, Ltd. v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
D. Maryland · 1996 · confidence medium
Id. at 1140. 10 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Margery A. MORSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
NATIONAL INSURANCE SERVICES, INC.; Pan American Life Insurance Company; The Shaw Agency; Scott Hankins, Defendants-Appellees
94-9152.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Apr 11, 1996.
81 F.3d 1031
1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7548
1996 WL 168606
Edward Francis Danowitz, Danowitz & Ryder, Atlanta, GA, for appellant., Michael T. Thornton, Linda M. FitzGerald, Atlanta, GA, for appellees.
Tjoflat, Kravitch, Hatchett, Anderson, Edmondson, Cox, Birch, Dubina, Black, Carnes, Barkett.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 69%
Citer courts: N.D. Georgia (1)

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, and KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en bane and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.