Unifund CCR Partners, Inc. v. Piaser, 121 N.E.3d 409 (Ohio 2019). · Go Syfert
Search
Unifund CCR Partners, Inc. v. Piaser, 121 N.E.3d 409 (Ohio 2019). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Hartman (Slip Opinion) (ohio, 2020-09-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Hartman (Slip Opinion)
Ohio · 2020 · confidence medium
The court therefore reversed his convictions and remanded the case for a new trial. {¶ 18} We accepted the state’s appeal on the following proposition of law: “In sexual assault cases, other acts evidence offered to prove the intent of the offender or the offender’s plan is admissible pursuant to Evid.R. 404(B), even when the identity of the offender is not at issue.” See 155 Ohio St.3d 1437 , 2019-Ohio- 1536, 121 N.E.3d 409 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNIFUND CCR PARTNERS, INC.
v.
PIASER
2019-0252.
Ohio Supreme Court.
May 1, 2019.
121 N.E.3d 409
Fischer.
Published
FISCHER, J., not participating.