Richard C. Ragland v. Dep't of the Army, 91 F.3d 166 (Fed. Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Richard C. Ragland v. Dep't of the Army, 91 F.3d 166 (Fed. Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
21 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Richard C. Ragland
v.
Department of the Army
96-3191.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Apr 17, 1996.
91 F.3d 166
1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37096
1996 WL 335465
Unpublished

91 F.3d 166

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Richard C. RAGLAND, Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, Respondent.

No. 96-3191.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 17, 1996.

ORDER

1

The petitioner having failed to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

2

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.