Rangel-Lopez v. Cox, 344 F. Supp. 3d 1285 (2018). · Go Syfert
Search
Rangel-Lopez v. Cox, 344 F. Supp. 3d 1285 (2018). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Queen v. Kansas City, Kansas Police Dep't, No. 2:25-cv-02292 (D. Kan. July 14, 2025)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 1289 “When addressing a motion for temporary restraining order, the court applies the same standard as it applies to a motion for preliminary injunction”11 citing cases1 citing court quotes it
  • Queen v. Kansas City, Kansas Police Dep't, No. 2:25-cv-02292 (D. Kan. July 14, 2025).
    Kan. 2001). 9 See Rangel-Lopez v. Cox, 344 F. Supp. 3d 1285, 1289 (D.
  • Queen v. Canale, No. 2:25-cv-02298 (D. Kan. July 11, 2025).
    Kan. 2001). 10 See Rangel-Lopez v. Cox, 344 F. Supp. 3d 1285, 1289 (D.
  • Culbertson v. Billam, No. 5:25-cv-04049 (D. Kan. May 12, 2025).
    Kan. 2001). 7 See Rangel-Lopez v. Cox, 344 F. Supp. 3d 1285, 1289 (D.
  • Brownlee (ID 73693) v. Cline, No. 5:20-cv-03122 (D. Kan. Apr. 8, 2024).
    Legal Standard The same standard is applicable to both a motion for TRO and a motion for preliminary injunction.6 A movant must demonstrate four factors to obtain relief: (1) the movant is likely to succeed on the merits; (2) the movant is…
  • Hueffmeier v. Talentum Empowerment Inst., LLC, No. 2:22-cv-02333 (D. Kan. Aug. 24, 2022).
    The heightened standard applies to preliminary injunctions that (1) disturb the status quo; (2) are mandatory rather than prohibitory; or (3) provide the movant substantially all the relief that it could recover after a full trial on the m…
  • Speight v. Wyoming Governor Gordon, No. 2:22-cv-00016 (D. Wyo. Jan. 27, 2022).
    “When addressing a motion for temporary restraining order, the court applies the same standard as it applies to a motion for preliminary injunction”
  • Snorsky v. Raemisch, No. 1:18-cv-03025 (D. Colo. Oct. 22, 2021).
    Rangel-Lopez v. Cox, 344 F. Supp. 3d 1285, 1289 (D.
  • Carson v. Gissi, No. 5:21-cv-04053 (D. Kan. Aug. 20, 2021).
    Kan. 2001). 4 See Rangel-Lopez v. Cox, 344 F. Supp. 3d 1285, 1289 (D.
  • McConnell v. IMA Fin. Grp., Inc., No. 6:21-cv-01041 (D. Kan. Mar. 9, 2021).
    Kan. 2001). 22 See Rangel-Lopez v. Cox, 344 F. Supp. 3d 1285, 1289 (D.
  • CGB Diversified Servs., Inc. v. Forsythe, No. 2:20-cv-02120 (D. Kan. Mar. 20, 2020).
    Kan. 2001). 2See Rangel-Lopez v. Cox, 344 F. Supp. 3d 1285, 1289 (D.
Show 1 more citing case
  • Tickets For Less, LLC v. Cypress Media, LLC, No. 2:20-cv-02047 (D. Kan. Feb. 3, 2020).
    First, the Complaint is not verified and the memorandum in support of TRO attaches an affidavit from 11Rangel-Lopez v. Cox, 344 F. Supp. 3d 1285, 1289 (D.
Alejandro RANGEL-LOPEZ and League of United Latin American Citizens, Kansas
v.
Deborah COX, Ford County Clerk, in Her Official Capacity
Nov 1, 2018.
344 F. Supp. 3d 1285
*1286Zal Kotval Shroff, ACLU Foundation of Kansas, Wichita, KS, for Plaintiffs., Bradley J. Schlozman, Mitchell L. Herren, Jeffrey M. Kuhlman, Hinkle Law Firm LLC, Wichita, KS, for Defendant., Daniel D. Crabtree, United States District Judge *1287Plaintiffs Alejandro Rangel-Lopez and League of United Latin American Citizens, Kansas, filed this lawsuit against Deborah Cox, Ford County Clerk, asserting that Ms. Cox's decision to move Dodge City, Kansas's only polling location from the Civic Center to the Western Bank Expo Center (located about one mile outside the city limits) imposes a substantial burden on all voters and thus violates their rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments.1 When filing their Complaint, plaintiffs also filed a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Doc. 4. Plaintiffs' motion seeks a temporary restraining order mandating defendant to: (1) reopen the polling location at the Civic Center in Dodge City, Kansas, or in a building within the city limits; and (2) notify all registered voters via mail that they can vote either at the Expo Center or the new location. Id. at 3. At the motion hearing on November 1, 2018, plaintiffs refined their request, explaining that it asks the court either to enjoin defendant to: (1) open two polling locations on Election Day-one at the Civic Center and another one at the Expo Center; or (2) move all voting to a single polling location at the Civic Center. For reasons explained below, the court denies plaintiffs' motion., For the last 20 years, the Civic Center has served as the only polling location in Dodge City, Kansas. On September 11, 2018, Ford County Clerk Deborah Cox-the County's chief election officer-unilaterally decided to move the polling location after learning that the city was planning construction in the vicinity of the Civic Center. Ms. Cox determined that the Western Bank Expo Center (\Expo Center\") was the best available location for a temporary polling site because it is owned by Ford County
Published  |  meets the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act

IT IS SO ORDERED.