Ent. Prods., Inc. v. Shelby Cnty., 562 U.S. 835 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Ent. Prods., Inc. v. Shelby Cnty., 562 U.S. 835 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jones v. United States (uscfc, 2015-07-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jones v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
“Proper exhaustion demands compliance with an agency’s deadlines and other critical procedural rules because no adjudicative system can function effectively without imposing some .orderly structure on the course of its proceedings.” Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. at 90-91, 126 S.Ct. 2378 ; see also Arctic Slope Native Assoc., Ltd. v. Sebelius, 583 F.3d 785, 793 (Fed.Cir.2009) (“Statutory time restrictions on the submission of administrative claims are a part of the requirement that a party must satisfy to properly exhaust administrative remedies.”), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied (Fed…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Entertainment Productions, Inc.
v.
Shelby County, Tennessee
No. 09-1460.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 2010.
562 U.S. 835
2010 U.S. LEXIS 5875
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 588 F.3d 372.