Barraza v. United States, 562 U.S. 842 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Barraza v. United States, 562 U.S. 842 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“it is beyond cavil that if the ground upon which an objection is based is specifically stated, all other reasons for its exclusion are waived.”
8 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commonwealth v. Hitcho, G., Aplt. (pa, 2015-09-29)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Commonwealth v. Hitcho, G., Aplt.
Pa. · 2015 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
it is beyond cavil that if the ground upon which an objection is based is specifically stated, all other reasons for its exclusion are waived.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hessel v. Department of Corrections
Or. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Handley v. Chapman, 587 F3d 273, 283 (5th Cir 2009), cert den, 562 US 842 (2010) (“New procedural rules published by an agency may be made to apply to pending proceedings and also retroactively if injury or prejudice does not result therefrom.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Leobarda B. Barraza
v.
United States
No. 09-9187.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 2010.
562 U.S. 842
2010 U.S. LEXIS 5990
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 59%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 576 F.3d 798.