Turnbull v. United States, 562 U.S. 975 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Turnbull v. United States, 562 U.S. 975 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“multiple revocations of concurrent terms of supervised release may result in consecutive time; there is no legal requirement that they must result in concurrent time.”
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: United States v. Nathan Souza (ca9, 2012-08-27)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Nathan Souza
9th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
multiple revocations of concurrent terms of supervised release may result in consecutive time; there is no legal requirement that they must result in concurrent time.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jayrece Elaine Turnbull
v.
United States
No. 10-6383.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 2010.
562 U.S. 975
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 73%
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 387 Fed. Appx. 322.