Hinkle v. Texas, 562 U.S. 1049 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Hinkle v. Texas, 562 U.S. 1049 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Frank Empey (texapp, 2016-08-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Frank Empey (2×)
Tex. App. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. (emphases added) (citations omitted); see also Mannix v. Phillips, 619 F.3d 187, 200 (2d Cir.) (“[N]o clearly established constitutional prohibition of statutory vagueness is violated when two statutes proscribe the same conduct and a defendant is charged under the one subjecting him to greater punishment.”), cert, denied, 562 U.S. 1049 , 131 S.Ct. 611 , 178 L.Ed.2d 445 (2010); State v. Rourke, 773 N.W.2d 913, 917 (Minn.2009) (citing Batchelder and stating that the “sentencing uncertainty-caused by two statutes that prohibit the same conduct, but prescribe different penalties, does n…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eric Randall Hinkle
v.
Texas
No. 10-6493.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 15, 2010.
562 U.S. 1049
2010 U.S. LEXIS 8831
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.