McGee v. Connecticut, 563 U.S. 945 (2011). · Go Syfert
Search
McGee v. Connecticut, 563 U.S. 945 (2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events (30 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Robinson (2×)
Kan. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Daniel, 291 Kan. 490, 498 , 242 P.3d 1186 (2010) (Section 15 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights provides “the same protection from unlawful government searches and seizures as the Fourth Amendment to the federal Constitution.”), cert. denied 131 S. Ct. 2114 (2011).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Cox
Kan. Ct. App. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Daniel, 291 Kan. 490, 498-500 , 242 P.3d 1186 (2010), cert. denied 131 S. Ct. 2114 (2011) (relying on Illinois v. Krull, 480 U.S. 340, 349-50 , 107 S. Ct. 1160 , 94 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Pettay (2×)
Kan. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Daniel, 291 Kan. 490, 505 , 242 P.3d 1186 (2010), cert. denied 131 S. Ct. 2114 (2011) (allowing evidence obtained based on officer’s objectively reasonable reliance on constitutionality of K.S.A. 22-2501[c]); see also State v. Carlton, 297 Kan. 642, 647 , 304 P.3d 323 (2013) (same); State v. Karson, 297 Kan. 634, 641 , 304 P.3d 317 (2013) (same); State v. Dennis, 297 Kan. 229, 240 , 300 P.3d 81 (2013) (same).
cited Cited "see" State v. Lundquist
Kan. Ct. App. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Daniel, 291 Kan. 490, 498 , 242 P.3d 1186 (2010), cert. denied 131 S. Ct. 2114 (2011).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Roy D. L.
Conn. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
As the trial court aptly noted in its decision, ‘‘[t]he evidence in this case proves that the defendant forced [R] to lie completely unclothed on his bed, sometimes with [the defendant’s] girlfriends present, so that he, the defen- dant, could place his hands and a wash cloth in, and on, R’s genital area, at times pulling apart R’s external genitalia to look inside, knowing full well from [R’s] words and actions that this conduct embarrassed her and that she wished for him to stop doing it.’’ Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, we agree wit…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Meitler
Kan. Ct. App. · 2015 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Daniel, 291 Kan. 490, 504-05 , 242 P.3d 1186 (2010), cert. denied 131 S. Ct. 2114 (2011); accord United States v. Vanness, 342 F.3d 1093, 1097-98 (10th Cir. 2003); United States v. Gambrell, 178 F.3d 927, 929-30 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashburn, 76 F. Supp. 3d 401 (E.D.N.Y. 2014); State v. Fierro, 853 N.W.2d 235 , 244 n.6 (S.D. 2014); Weems v. State, 434 S.W.3d 655, 666 (Tex. App. 2014).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Campbell
Kan. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 2d 639 [1980]); see also State v. Daniel, 291 Kan. 490, 498 , 242 P.3d 1186 (2010) (“We interpret Section 15 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights to provide the same protection from unlawful government searches and seizures as the Fourth Amendment to the federal constitution.”), cert. denied 131 S. Ct. 2114 (2011).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Frank McGee
v.
Connecticut
No. 10-9121.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 2011.
563 U.S. 945
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Appellate Court of Connecticut denied.

Same case below, 124 Conn. App. 261, 4 A.3d 837.