search warrant requirement in Kansas

47 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2022 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Mendezgreen kan · 2003 · cited in 5 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2004–2008 2 sentences 2008State v. Ibarra, 282 Kan. 530, 536 , 147 P.3d 842 (2006); State v. Mendez, 275 Kan. 412, 420-21 , 66 P.3d 811 (2003). 2007We further said in Canaan that ‘[t]he exclusionary rule prohibits the admissions of the “fruits” of illegally seized evidence, i.e., any information, object, or testimony uncovered or obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of the illegally seized evidence or any leads obtained therefrom.’ 265 Kan. 835 , Syl. ¶ 3.” 275 Kan. at 420-21 . *710 One of the recognized exceptions to the search warrant requirement is the contemporaneous search incident to arrest doctrine, which in Kansas is statutorily based.	3	5
State v. Canaangreen kan · 1998 · cited in 2 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2007–2009 2 sentences 2009State v. Canaan, 265 Kan. 835, 840, 843 , 964 P.2d 681 (1998). 2007We further said in Canaan that ‘[t]he exclusionary rule prohibits the admissions of the “fruits” of illegally seized evidence, i.e., any information, object, or testimony uncovered or obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of the illegally seized evidence or any leads obtained therefrom.’ 265 Kan. 835 , Syl. ¶ 3.” 275 Kan. at 420-21 . *710 One of the recognized exceptions to the search warrant requirement is the contemporaneous search incident to arrest doctrine, which in Kansas is statutorily based.	1	2
State v. Doelzgreen kan · 2019 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020 1 sentence 2020See Doelz, 309 Kan. at 140 (noting this as one of the recognized exceptions to the warrant requirement).	1	1
City of L. A. v. Patelgreen scotus · 2015 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018See City of Los Angeles, Calif. v. Patel , 576 U.S. ----, 135 S.Ct. 2443 , 2451, 192 L.Ed.2d 435 (2015). 2018See City of Los Angeles, Calif. v. Patel , 576 U.S. ----, 135 S.Ct. 2443 , 2451, 192 L.Ed.2d 435 (2015).	1	1
State v. Vandeveldegreen kanctapp · 2006 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013 1 sentence 2013See Vandevelde, 36 Kan.	1	1
United States v. Charles S. Hammettgreen ca9 · 2001 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007 2 sentences 2007See Hammett, 236 F.3d at 1159-60 . 2007See Hammett, 236 F.3d at 1059-60 .	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (34)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Neighbors green kan · 2014 2 sentences 2020State v. Neighbors, 299 Kan. 234, 239 , 328 P.3d 1081 (2014). 2020State v. Neighbors, 299 Kan. 234, 239 , 328 P.3d 1081 (2014).	9	2015–2020
State v. Fitzgerald green kan · 2008 2 sentences 2011Fitzgerald, 286 Kan. at 1126-27 , 192 P.3d 171 . 2011Fitzgerald, 286 Kan. at 1126-27 , 192 P.3d 171 .	4	2009–2011
State v. Sanchez-Loredo green kan · 2012 2 sentences 2021Nevertheless, in Sanchez-Loredo, our Supreme Court held that "the mobility of the vehicle provides the exigent circumstances without the necessity of proving anything more." 294 Kan. 50 , Syl. ¶ 4. 2021Sanchez-Loredo, 294 Kan. 50 , Syl. ¶ 4.	3	2018–2021
Minnesota v. Dickerson green scotus · 1993 2 sentences 2001In State v. Wonders, 263 Kan. 582 , 952 P.2d 1351 (1998), this court recognized the plain feel exception to the search warrant requirement announced by the United States Supreme Court in Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366 , 124 L. 2001In State v. Wonders, 263 Kan. 582 , 952 P.2d 1351 (1998), this court recognized the plain feel exception to the search warrant requirement announced by the United States Supreme Court in Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366 , 124 L.	3	1998–2001
State v. Daniel green kan · 2010 2 sentences 2013State v. Daniel, 291 Kan. 490, 496 , 242 P.3d 1186 (2010), cert. denied 131 S. Ct. 2114 (2011). 2013State v. Daniel, 291 Kan. 490, 496 , 242 P.3d 1186 (2010), cert. denied 131 S. Ct. 2114 (2011).	2	2011–2013
State v. Thompson green kan · 2007 2 sentences 2009Ed. 2d 38 , 101 S. Ct. 1642 (1981); State v. Thompson, 284 Kan. 763, 776 , 166 P.3d 1015 (2007) (listing exceptions to the search warrant requirement). 2009Ed. 2d 38 , 101 S. Ct. 1642 (1981); State v. Thompson, 284 Kan. 763, 776 , 166 P.3d 1015 (2007) (listing exceptions to the search warrant requirement).	2	2009–2009
Steagald v. United States green scotus · 1981 2 sentences 2009Ed. 2d 38 , 101 S. Ct. 1642 (1981); State v. Thompson, 284 Kan. 763, 776 , 166 P.3d 1015 (2007) (listing exceptions to the search warrant requirement). 2009Ed. 2d 38 , 101 S. Ct. 1642 (1981); State v. Thompson, 284 Kan. 763, 776 , 166 P.3d 1015 (2007) (listing exceptions to the search warrant requirement).	2	2009–2009
State v. Wonders green kan · 1998 2 sentences 2001In State v. Wonders, 263 Kan. 582 , 952 P.2d 1351 (1998), this court recognized the plain feel exception to the search warrant requirement announced by the United States Supreme Court in Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366 , 124 L. 2001In State v. Wonders, 263 Kan. 582 , 952 P.2d 1351 (1998), this court recognized the plain feel exception to the search warrant requirement announced by the United States Supreme Court in Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366 , 124 L.	2	2001–2001
State v. Galloway green kan · 1982 2 sentences 1998We have previously adopted the plain view exception to the search warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment in State v. Galloway, 232 Kan. 87 , Syl. ¶ 2, 652 P.2d 673 (1982), where we held: “The ‘plain view’ exception to the 4th Amendment applies when 1) the initial intrusion which afforded authorities the plain view is lawful; 2) the discovery of the evidence is inadvertent; and 3) the incriminating character of the article is immediately apparent to searching authorities.” It is consistent with our previous decisions to recognize the plain feel exception announced by the Court in Dickerson 1998We have previously adopted the plain view exception to the search warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment in State v. Galloway, 232 Kan. 87 , Syl. ¶ 2, 652 P.2d 673 (1982), where we held: “The ‘plain view’ exception to the 4th Amendment applies when 1) the initial intrusion which afforded authorities the plain view is lawful; 2) the discovery of the evidence is inadvertent; and 3) the incriminating character of the article is immediately apparent to searching authorities.” It is consistent with our previous decisions to recognize the plain feel exception announced by the Court in Dickerson	2	1985–1998
State v. Overman green kan · 2015 2 sentences 2022In State v. Overman, 301 Kan. 704 , Syl. ¶ 3, 348 P.3d 516 (2015), the Kansas 4 Supreme Court discussed the automobile exception, a subclass of the probable cause plus exigent circumstances exception: "Under the automobile exception, the mobility of the vehicle establishes the requisite exigency, thereby permitting a vehicle search based on probable cause alone. 2022In State v. Overman, 301 Kan. 704 , Syl. ¶ 3, 348 P.3d 516 (2015), the Kansas 4 Supreme Court discussed the automobile exception, a subclass of the probable cause plus exigent circumstances exception: "Under the automobile exception, the mobility of the vehicle establishes the requisite exigency, thereby permitting a vehicle search based on probable cause alone.	1	2022–2022
State v. Hubbard green kan · 2018 1 sentence 2020State v. 5 Hubbard, 309 Kan. 22 , 33, 430 P.3d 956 (2018).	1	2020–2020
Mapp v. Ohio green scotus · 1961 2 sentences 2017Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 655 , 81 S. Ct. 1684 , 6 L. 2017Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 655 , 81 S. Ct. 1684 , 6 L.	1	2017–2017
State v. Heidi H. Swenson neutral idahoctapp · 2014 1 sentence 2017Keenan, 304 Kan. at 993 (quoting State v. Neighbors, 299 Kan. 234, 239 , 329 P.3d 1081 [2014]).	1	2017–2017
State v. Keenan green kan · 2016 1 sentence 2017Keenan, 304 Kan. at 993 (quoting State v. Neighbors, 299 Kan. 234, 239 , 329 P.3d 1081 [2014]).	1	2017–2017
Terry v. Ohio green scotus · 1968 2 sentences 2016A valid traffic stop—based on the officer's reasonable suspicion that a crime (including a traffic offense) is being committed—is a permissible seizure within the investigatory detention exception established by Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 18-19 , 88 S. Ct. 1868 , 20 L. 2016A valid traffic stop—based on the officer's reasonable suspicion that a crime (including a traffic offense) is being committed—is a permissible seizure within the investigatory detention exception established by Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 18-19 , 88 S. Ct. 1868 , 20 L.	1	2016–2016
State v. Adee green kan · 1987 2 sentences 2014The Adee court determined from its review of the original bill that the legislature did not intend to create a search warrant exception to the existing statutory provision that prohibited blood alcohol testing after a refusal but instead intended to clarify that nothing in the implied consent statute rendered alcohol concentration test results arising out of search warrants issued under some other authority inadmissible in DUI trials. 241 Kan. at 832 . 2014The Adee court determined from its review of the original bill that the legislature did not intend to create a search warrant exception to the existing statutory provision that prohibited blood alcohol testing after a refusal but instead intended to clarify that nothing in the implied consent statute rendered alcohol concentration test results arising out of search warrants issued under some other authority inadmissible in DUI trials. 241 Kan. at 832 .	1	2014–2014
McGee v. Connecticut green scotus · 2011 1 sentence 2013State v. Daniel, 291 Kan. 490, 496 , 242 P.3d 1186 (2010), cert. denied 131 S. Ct. 2114 (2011).	1	2013–2013
Florida v. Wells green scotus · 1990 2 sentences 2011Florida v. Wells, 495 U.S. 1, 4 , 110 S. Ct. 1632 , 109 L. 2011Florida v. Wells, 495 U.S. 1, 4 , 110 S. Ct. 1632 , 109 L.	1	2011–2011
Colorado v. Bertine green scotus · 1987 1 sentence 2011Bertine, 479 U.S. at 374-75 .	1	2011–2011
State v. Ibarra green kan · 2006 2 sentences 2008State v. Ibarra, 282 Kan. 530, 536 , 147 P.3d 842 (2006); State v. Mendez, 275 Kan. 412, 420-21 , 66 P.3d 811 (2003). 2008State v. Ibarra, 282 Kan. 530, 536 , 147 P.3d 842 (2006); State v. Mendez, 275 Kan. 412, 420-21 , 66 P.3d 811 (2003).	1	2008–2008
State v. Anderson green kan · 1996 2 sentences 2007See Mendez, 275 Kan. at 421 ; State v. Anderson, 259 Kan. 16, 19 , 910 P.2d 180 (1996). 2007See Mendez, 275 Kan. at 421 ; State v. Anderson, 259 Kan. 16, 19 , 910 P.2d 180 (1996).	1	2007–2007
State v. Boyd green kan · 2003	1	2006–2006
Hester v. United States green scotus · 1924 2 sentences 2006The open fields doctrine, which provides an exception to the search warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment was first recognized by United States Supreme Court in Hester v. United States, 265 U.S. 57, 59 , 68 L. 2006The open fields doctrine, which provides an exception to the search warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment was first recognized by United States Supreme Court in Hester v. United States, 265 U.S. 57, 59 , 68 L.	1	2006–2006
State v. Conn green kan · 2004 2 sentences 2006State v. Conn, 278 Kan. 387, 390-91 , 99 P.3d 1108 (2004). 2006State v. Conn, 278 Kan. 387, 390-91 , 99 P.3d 1108 (2004).	1	2006–2006
Oliver v. United States green scotus · 1984 2 sentences 2006Ed. 898 , 44 S. Ct. 445 -(1924), which held that “the special protection accorded by the Fourth Amendment to the people in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,’ is not extended to the open fields.” Sixty years later, the Court clarified the open fields doctrine in Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 170 , 80 L. 2006Ed. 898 , 44 S. Ct. 445 -(1924), which held that “the special protection accorded by the Fourth Amendment to the people in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,’ is not extended to the open fields.” Sixty years later, the Court clarified the open fields doctrine in Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 170 , 80 L.	1	2006–2006
State v. Jones green kanctapp · 1978	1	2003–2003
State v. Kriegh green kanctapp · 1997	1	2002–2002
State v. Parker green kan · 1984	1	1998–1998
State v. Johnson green kan · 1993	1	1997–1997
State v. Crowder green kanctapp · 1994	1	1997–1997
Sabbath v. United States green scotus · 1968	1	1995–1995
State v. Pearson green kan · 1984	1	1993–1993
State v. Jacques green kan · 1978	1	1986–1986
Franks v. Delaware green scotus · 1978	1	1986–1986

Statutes the citing opinions construe

KS § K.S.A. § 22-2402 (6) KS § K.S.A. § 22-2501 (6) KS § K.S.A. § 65-4160 (6) KS § K.S.A. § 8-1001 (6) KS § K.S.A. § 65-4152 (5) KS § K.S.A. § 22-3216 (4) KS § K.S.A. § 21-3107 (3) KS § K.S.A. § 22-2202 (3) KS § K.S.A. § 22-2401 (3) KS § K.S.A. § 22-3603 (3) KS § K.S.A. § 8-1025 (3) KS § K.S.A. § 8-1567 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

OH 122 (1981–2026) PA 90 (1981–2025) LA 54 (1974–2019) KS 47 (1985–2022) MI 41 (1922–2022) CA 37 (1962–2026) NY 35 (1972–2025) WA 34 (1973–2018) TX 33 (1981–2021) IL 31 (1970–2024) FL 29 (1978–2024) TN 25 (1975–2024) NJ 23 (1979–2026) MA 23 (1971–2025) IN 22 (1968–2020) GA 20 (2003–2023) IA 16 (1969–2026) MN 16 (1987–2024) MT 15 (1980–2025) ND 15 (1981–2019) OR 14 (1968–2022) NE 13 (1978–2023) VA 12 (1993–2023) AL 12 (1976–2012) WI 12 (1978–2021) AK 10 (1972–1996) MD 9 (1971–2015) CT 9 (1976–2020) MO 9 (1974–2017) AZ 9 (1978–2015) CO 8 (1980–2024) SC 7 (1983–2019) HI 7 (1980–2020) DC 7 (1977–2016) NC 7 (1976–2009) ID 7 (1979–2017) WV 6 (1922–2015) WY 6 (1982–2016) DE 6 (1973–2025) SD 5 (2003–2015) RI 5 (1989–2007) AR 5 (1967–2014) UT 5 (1987–2016) NV 4 (1975–2013) OK 4 (1927–1992) NM 4 (1997–2013) KY 4 (1988–2021) ME 3 (1981–2017) NH 3 (1983–2017) VT 2 (1991–2012) MS 2 (2003–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check