Hodge v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 565 U.S. 805 (2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Hodge v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 565 U.S. 805 (2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Salemo (ca2, 2012-10-10)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Salemo
2d Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Miller, 626 F.3d 682, 688 (2d Cir.2010), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 379 , 181 L.Ed.2d 239 (2011).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Dexter Tyson
4th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Miller, 626 F.3d 682 , 688 & n. 4 (2d Cir.2010) (determination that evidence was irrelevant reviewed for abuse of discretion), cert. denied,-U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 379 , 181 L.Ed.2d 239 (2011).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Zayac
2d Cir. · 2014 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Miller, 626 F.3d 682, 688 (2d Cir.2010) (“[E]ven where we conclude that an evidentiary ruling was manifestly erroneous, we will nonetheless affirm if the error was harmless — that is, if we can conclude that the error did not affect substantial rights.” (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, — U.S.—, 132 S.Ct. 379 , 181 L.Ed.2d 239 (2011); Fed.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States. v. Zayac
2d Cir. · 2014 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Miller, 626 F.3d 682, 688 (2d Cir. 2010) (ʺ[E]ven where we conclude that an evidentiary ruling was manifestly erroneous, we will nonetheless affirm if the error was harmless—that is, if we can conclude that the error did not affect substantial rights.ʺ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 379 (2011); Fed.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Gupta
2d Cir. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
Oluwanisola, 605 F.3d at 134 ; see also United States v. Miller, 626 F.3d 682, 690 (2d Cir.2010) (focusing principally on the overall strength of the prosecution’s case), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 379 , 181 L.Ed.2d 239 (2011); United States v. Song, 436 F.3d 137, 139-40 (2d Cir.2006) (focusing principally on the extent to which the defendant was otherwise able to present the defense and on the presence of evidence corroborating the government’s case); United States v. Lawal, 736 F.2d 5, 9 (2d Cir.1984) (focusing principally on the overall strength of the prosecution’s case and o…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harold H. Hodge, Jr.
v.
Board of County Commissioners
No. 10-11235.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 2011.
565 U.S. 805
2011 U.S. LEXIS 6241
Published

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

Same case below, 414 Fed. Appx. 567.