Tullis v. UMB Bank, N.A., 565 U.S. 1148 (2012).

Tullis v. UMB Bank, N.A., 565 U.S. 1148 (2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment 12.3 score

10 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.

Strongest positive: United States v. Sean Frazier (ca4, 2013-06-27)

Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Sean Frazier

4th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Brown, 653 F.3d 337, 340 (4th Cir.2011) (applying rule of Marks v. United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193 , 97 S.Ct. 990 , 51 L.Ed.2d 260 (1977) to find Justice Sotomayor’s opinion in Freeman controlling), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1003 , 181 L.Ed.2d 791 (2012).

cited Cited "see" United States v. Woodland

4th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high

Jan. 17, 2012); see United States v. Brown, 658 F.3d 337 (4th Cir. 2011), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1003 , 181 L.Ed.2d 791 (2012).

cited Cited "see" United States v. Lorman Scott, Jr.

4th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Brown, 653 F.3d 337, 340 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1003 , 181 L.Ed.2d 791 (2012).

cited Cited "see" United States v. Wright

4th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high

Aug. 4, 2011); see United States v. Brown, 653 F.3d 337 (4th Cir.2011), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 182 S.Ct. 1003 , 181 L.Ed.2d 791 (2012).

cited Cited "see" United States v. Krikheli

2d Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. O’Connor, 650 F.3d 839, 855 (2d Cir.2011), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 1040 , 181 L.Ed.2d 791 (2012).

cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Abreu

2d Cir. · 2023 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low

See, e.g., United States v. O’Connor, 650 F.3d 839, 853 (2d Cir. 2011), cert. denied, 565 U.S. 1148 (2012); United States v. Larson, 112 F.3d 600 , 604–05 (2d Cir. 1997).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Campo Flores

2d Cir. · 2019 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low

See, e.g., United States v. O'Connor, 650 F.3d 839 , 14 862-63 (2d Cir. 2011) ("O'Connor") (trial judge had discretion to allow introduction of 15 a prior consistent statement even before the declarant had given any testimony, 16 where the defendants "had begun their attacks on the credibility of [the declarant's] 17 expected testimony in their opening statements" and "it was clear" that the declarant 18 would be called to testify and "could be cross-examined by the defense about the 32 1 statement"), cert. denied, 565 U.S. 1148 (2012).