discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Nunez See also Bondholder Comm. v. Williamson County (In re Brentwood Outpatient, Ltd.), 43 F.3d 256 , 261 (6th Cir.1994), cert. denied 514 U.S. 1096 , 115 S.Ct. 1824 , 131 L.Ed.2d 745 (1995) ("The [Supreme] Court [in Ron Pair] found that § 506[b] provides for postpetition interest on oversecured claims whether they arise by operation of law or under an agreement, but allows postpetition fees and costs only to consensual oversecured lienholders whose claims arise by agreement”).

cited Cited "see, e.g." In Re Walsh See also Bondholder Comm. v. Williamson Co. (In re Brentwood Outpatient, Ltd.), 43 F.3d 256 (6th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1096 , 115 S.Ct. 1824 , 131 L.Ed.2d 745 (1995).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." State Bank of Southern Utah v. Rushton All the Justices of the Supreme Court therefore accept the majority's basic premise that neither consensual nor nonconsensual lienhold-ers are entitled to post-petition additions such as fees, costs, and charges because "in the absence of an agreement, post-petition interest is the only added recovery available.” Id. at 241 , 109 S.Ct. at 1030 ; See also, In re Brentwood Outpatient, Ltd., 43 F.3d 256 , 261 (6th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 1824 , 131 L.Ed.2d 745 (1995). 7 .Footnote 5 states that: It seems to us that the interpretation adopted by the Court of Appeals in this …

discussed Cited "see, e.g." DARILE JOHNSON v. RAYMOND ROBERTS and MIKE MOORE “In determining whether a delay of a prisoner’s appeal violates due process, this court looks to the factors set forth in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530 (1972).” Bailey v. Scott, No. 94-10917, at 3 (5th Cir. May 24, 1995) (unpublished); see also United States v. Bermea, 30 F.3d 1539, 1568-69 (5th Cir. 1994) (citing Rheuark v. Shaw, 628 F.2d 297, 302-04 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 931 (1981)), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1113 , and cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1824 (1995).