White v. Univision of Virginia, Inc., 546 U.S. 872 (2005). · Go Syfert
White v. Univision of Virginia, Inc., 546 U.S. 872 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: John Fox v. Joe Wardy, Mayor, Susan Austin, Jose A. Lozano, John F. Cook, Daniel S. Power, Paul J. Escobar, Vivian Rojas, Anthony Cobos (texapp, 2010-06-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" John Fox v. Joe Wardy, Mayor, Susan Austin, Jose A. Lozano, John F. Cook, Daniel S. Power, Paul J. Escobar, Vivian Rojas, Anthony Cobos
Tex. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gomez v. Housing Authority of the City of El Paso , 148 S.W.3d 471, 482 (Tex. App. - El Paso 2004), cert. denied , 546 U.S. 872 , 126 S.Ct. 379 , 163 L.Ed.2d 166 (2005); Hallmark v. City of Fredericksburg , 94 S.W.3d 703, 708 (Tex. App. - San Antonio 2002, pet. denied).
discussed Cited "see" John Fox v. Joe Wardy, Mayor, Susan Austin, Jose A. Lozano, John F. Cook, Daniel S. Power, Paul J. Escobar, Vivian Rojas, Anthony Cobos
Tex. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gomez v. Housing Authority of the City of El Paso, 148 S.W.3d 471, 482 (Tex. App. – El Paso 2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 872 , 126 S.Ct. 379 , 163 L.Ed.2d 166 (2005); Hallmark v. City of Fredericksburg, 94 S.W.3d 703, 708 (Tex. App. – San Antonio 2002, pet. denied).
discussed Cited "see" Fox v. Wardy
Tex. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gomez v. Housing Authority of the City of El Paso, 148 S.W.3d 471, 482 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 872 , 126 S.Ct. 379 , 163 L.Ed.2d 166 (2005); Hallmark v. City of Fredericksburg, 94 S.W.3d 703, 708 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2002, pet. denied).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Theodore M. WHITE
v.
UNIVISION OF VIRGINIA, INC.
No. 05-75.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Oct 3, 2005.
546 U.S. 872
2005 U.S. LEXIS 5774
Consideration, Took.
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.