Sherwood Partners, Inc. v. Lycos, Inc., 126 S. Ct. 397 (9th Cir. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Sherwood Partners, Inc. v. Lycos, Inc., 126 S. Ct. 397 (9th Cir. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“general rule" is "that a reviewing court should not disturb a jury's award of damages unless it is clearly excessive in relation to what the plaintiff's evidence has demonstrated damages to be”
23 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: DaPrato v. Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (mass, 2019-06-05)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) DaPrato v. Massachusetts Water Resources Authority
Mass. · 2019 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
general rule" is "that a reviewing court should not disturb a jury's award of damages unless it is clearly excessive in relation to what the plaintiff's evidence has demonstrated damages to be
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) York v. Zurich Scudder Investments, Inc.
Mass. App. Ct. · 2006 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
there is no general duty on the part of an employer to act 'nicely
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SHERWOOD PARTNERS, INC.
v.
LYCOS, INC., aka Delaware Lycos, Inc.
No. 04-1607.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Oct 3, 2005.
126 S. Ct. 397
Consideration, Motion, Took.
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 75%
Citer courts: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial… (1) · Massachusetts Appeals Court (1)

Motion of Receivers, Incorporated and Uecker & Associates, Inc. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.