green
Positive treatment
Issue: facts and prepare defenseNJ ↗
Issue: late notice claimNJ ↗
Issue: act unless claimNJ ↗
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Lamb v. Global Landfill Reclaiming
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Super. 420 (App.Div. 1977) (claimant aware of potential cause of action but delayed acting because of alleged erroneous advice of attorney), certif. den., 75 N.J. 610 *149 (1978); Bell, supra, 147 N.J.
cited
Cited "see"
Batko v. SAYREVILLE DEM. ORG.
Accord O'Neill v. Lerner, 154 N.J.Super. 317, 325 , 381 A.2d 383 (App.Div.1977), certif. denied, 75 N.J. 610 , 384 A. 2d 840 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Greenway Development Co. v. Borough of Paramus
Two of the primary purposes advanced by the notice requirement are: (1) “to expedite investigation with the hope of reaching nonjudicial settlement”; and (2) “to protect the public entity’s access to current information about the incident giving rise to the claim.” Reale v. Township of Wayne, 132 N.J.Super. 100, 109 , 332 A.2d 236 (Law Div.1975); see Fuller v. Rutgers, The State University, 154 N.J.Super. 420, 425-27 , 381 A.2d 811 (App.Div.1977), certif. denied, 75 N.J. 610 , 384 A.2d 840 (1978). *553 In an inverse condemnation action, a landowner is seeking compensation for a de fa…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
v.
WALTER SAXTON
v.
WALTER SAXTON
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Feb 15, 1978.
Published
Petition for certification denied.