green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
RAVIN & ROSEN v. Lowenstein Sandler
This requirement stems in part from the "paralytic" effect of a receiver on the corporate affairs. [ Id. at 513, 464 A. 2d at 1148 (citations omitted).] And in Eelman v. Johnson Products Co., 103 N.J.Eq. 294, 143 A. 326 (E. & A.1928), while rejecting the demand of stockholders that they were entitled to name a statutory receiver for the corporation, the court observed that "the appointment of a receiver is a judicial act and the right to name him [or her] belongs to the court." Id. at 296, 143 A. at 327 .
cited
Cited "see"
Muscarelle v. Castano
See First Nat'l State Bank of New Jersey v. Kron, 190 N.J.Super. 510, 513 , 464 A.2d 1146 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 95 N.J. 204 , 470 A.2d 424 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
RICHARD LONGCOR
v.
DRESSER INDUSTRIES, INC.
v.
DRESSER INDUSTRIES, INC.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Nov 1, 1983.
Published
Petition for certification denied.