In re Cabelo, 664 A.2d 492 (N.J. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Cabelo, 664 A.2d 492 (N.J. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOSE A. ROMERO-AGUIRRE (17-05-0388, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (njsuperctappdiv, 2022-01-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOSE A. ROMERO-AGUIRRE (17-05-0388, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 2022 · confidence medium
In the event the Legislature does not clearly express its intent to give a statute prospective application, we "must determine whether to apply the statute retroactively." Ibid. (quoting Twiss v. Dep't of Treasury, 142 N.J. 461, 467 (1991)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY J. CABELO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Sep 25, 1995.
664 A.2d 492
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

ORDER

The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed a petition with the Supreme Court recommending that ANTHONY J. CABELO of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1975, be immediately temporarily suspended from the practice of law, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANTHONY J. CABELO is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, and until further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by ANTHONY J. CABELO, pursuant to Rule 1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court, for good cause shown, pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that ANTHONY J. CABELO be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.