Scott v. Mayflower Home Improvement Corp., 715 A.2d 988 (N.J. 1998). · Go Syfert
Scott v. Mayflower Home Improvement Corp., 715 A.2d 988 (N.J. 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Bass v. DeVink (njsuperctappdiv, 2001-01-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bass v. DeVink (2×)
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 2001 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Fu v. Fu, 309 N.J.Super. 435, 439-40 , 707 A. 2d 473 (App.Div.), appeal granted, 155 N.J. 585 , 715 A. 2d 988 (1998); Hallowell v. American Honda Motor Co., 297 N.J.Super. 314, 318 , 688 A. 2d 110 (App.Div.1997); DeFelice v. Beall, 274 N.J.Super. 592 , 595 n. 1, 644 A. 2d 1136 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 138 N.J. 268 , 649 A. 2d 1288 (1994); Kurzman v. Appicie, 273 N.J.Super. 189, 191-92 , 641 A. 2d 566 (App.Div.1994); Procanik v. Cillo, 226 N.J.Super. 132 , 143 n. 4, 543 A. 2d 985 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 113 N.J. 357 , 550 A. 2d 466 (1988); DiMarino v. Wishkin, 195 N.J.Super. 3…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." D'OLIVIERA v. Micol (2×)
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1999 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Fu v. Fu, 309 N.J.Super. 435, 439-440 , 707 A. 2d 473 (App.Div.), appeal granted, 155 N.J. 585 , 715 A. 2d 988 (1998); Hallowell v. American Honda Motor Co., 297 N.J.Super. 314, 318 , 688 A. 2d 110 (App.Div.1997); DeFelice v. Beall, 274 N.J.Super. 592 , 595 n. 1, 644 A. 2d 1136 (App.Div.), certif. denied 138 N.J. 268 , 649 A. 2d 1288 (1994); Kurzman v. Appicie, 273 N.J.Super. 189, 191-192 , 641 A. 2d 566 (App.Div.1994); Procanik v. Cillo, 226 N.J.Super. 132, 143 , 543 A. 2d 985 n. 4 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 113 N.J. 357 , 550 A. 2d 466 (1988); DiMarino v. Wishkin, 195 N.J.Super. …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
FRANCES SCOTT, PLAINTIFF-MOVANT
v.
MAYFLOWER HOME IMPROVEMENT CORP., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jun 30, 1998.
715 A.2d 988
1998 N.J. LEXIS 632
Published

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that the motion for

Leave to appeal is granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division to consider the appeal on the merits.