California State Bd. of Equalization v. Sierra Summit, Inc., 109 S. Ct. 554 (1988). · Go Syfert
Search
California State Bd. of Equalization v. Sierra Summit, Inc., 109 S. Ct. 554 (1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Liggett Group Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (njd, 2000-05-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Liggett Group Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
D.N.J. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
“When two suits involving the same parties and subject matter are pending concurrently, the first-filed suit should have priority absent a showing that the balance of inconvenience favors transfer or unless there are special circumstances which justify giving priority to the second suit.” Honeywell, 817 F.Supp. at 487 (citing AT & T, 736 F.Supp. at 1308 ); see E.E.O.C. v. University of Pennsylvania, 850 F.2d 969, 974 (3d Cir.), cert. granted in part, 488 U.S. 992 , 109 S.Ct. 554 , 102 L.Ed.2d 581 , (1988), aff'd, 493 U.S. 182 , 110 S.Ct. 577 , 107 L.Ed.2d 571 , (1990).
discussed Cited "see" Lawrence v. Xerox Corp.
D.N.J. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
“When two suits involving the same parties and subject matter are pending concurrently, the first-filed suit should have priority absent a showing that the balance of inconvenience favors transfer or unless there are special circumstances which justify giving priority to the second suit.” Honeywell, 817 F.Supp. at 487 (citing AT & T, 736 F.Supp. at 1308 ); see E.E.O.C. v. University of Pennsylvania, 850 F.2d 969, 974 (3d Cir.), cert. granted in part, 488 U.S. 992 , 109 S.Ct. 554 , 102 L.Ed.2d 581 (1988), affd, 493 U.S. 182 , 110 S.Ct. 577 , 107 L.Ed.2d 571 (1990).
cited Cited "see" Plating Resources, Inc. v. UTI Corp.
N.D. Ohio · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See E.E.O.C. v. University of Pennsylvania, 850 F.2d 969, 972 (3rd Cir.), cert, granted in part, 488 U.S. 992 , 109 S.Ct. 554 , 102 L.Ed.2d 581 (1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Moore Corp. Ltd. v. Wallace Computer Services, Inc.
D. Del. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Crosley Corp. v. Hazeltine Corp., 122 F.2d 925, 929 (3d Cir.1941), cert. denied, 315 U.S. 813 , 62 S.Ct. 798 , 86 L.Ed. 1211 (1942); see also E.E.O.C. v. University of Pa., 850 F.2d 969, 971 (3d Cir.), cert. granted in part, 488 U.S. 992 , 109 S.Ct. 554 , 102 L.Ed.2d 581 (1988), aff'd, 493 U.S. 182 , 110 S.Ct. 577 , 107 L.Ed.2d 571 (1990) [hereinafter EEOC ].
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Alltrade, Inc. v. Uniweld Products, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
First-To-File Rule The first-to-file rule was developed to “serve[ ] the purpose of promoting efficiency well and should not be disregarded lightly.” Church of Scientology v. United States Dep’t of the Army, 611 F.2d 738 , 750 (9th Cir.1979); see also EEOC v. University of Pennsylvania, 850 F.2d 969, 971 (3d Cir.), cert. granted in part, 488 U.S. 992 , 109 S.Ct. 554 , 102 L.Ed.2d 581 (1988), order amended, 490 U.S. 1015 , 109 S.Ct. 1660 , 104 L.Ed.2d 173 (1989), aff'd on other grounds, 493 U.S. 182 , 110 S.Ct. 577 , 107 L.Ed.2d 571 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
v.
SIERRA SUMMIT, INC.
No. 88-681.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 12, 1988.
109 S. Ct. 554
Consideration, Took.
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Granted.

Justice BRENNAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.