Ramirez v. United States, 110 S. Ct. 2176 (1990). · Go Syfert
Ramirez v. United States, 110 S. Ct. 2176 (1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events across 6 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990 2008 2026
Cited for
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“A federal court is confined to the administrative record in deciding an appeal under the APA, unless the plaintiff can make a ‘strong showing of bad faith or improper behavior.’”quoted beside the cite; not in this opinion · 2 citing cases listed
  • Downer v. United States Ex Rel. United States Dep't of Agric. & Soil Conservation Serv., 894 F. Supp. 1348 (D.S.D. 1995).published
    “A federal court is confined to the administrative record in deciding an appeal under the APA, unless the plaintiff can make a ‘strong showing of bad faith or improper behavior.’”
  • Von Eye v. United States, 887 F. Supp. 1287 (D.S.D. 1995).published
    “A federal court is confined to the administrative record in deciding an appeal under the APA, unless the plaintiff can make a ‘strong showing of bad faith or improper behavior.’”
Other citing cases3 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Maria Graciela RAMIREZ
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 89-1592.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 14, 1990.
Published opinion
110 S. Ct. 2176

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Denied.