discussed Cited "see, e.g." Securities Investor Protection Corporation v. Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, LLC. et a In fact, “virtually every court to address the question has held that to the extent that investors have received payments in excess of the amounts they have invested, those payments are voidable as fraudulent transfers.” Bayou, 439 B.R. at 337 (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); accord Omnibus Good Faith Decision, 531 B.R. at 462 ; see also Silverman v. Cullin (In re Agape World, Inc.), 633 F. App’x 16, 17 (2d Cir.) (noting that the “prevailing view” among district and bankruptcy courts in the Second Circuit is to treat the payment of interest in Ponzi schemes as fraudu…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Irving H. Picard trustee for the liquidation of Be v. Nelson In fact, “virtually every court to address the question has held that to the extent that investors have received payments in excess of the amounts they have invested, those payments are voidable as fraudulent transfers.” Bayou, 439 B.R. at 337 (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); accord Omnibus Good Faith Decision, 531 B.R. at 462 ; see also Silverman v. Cullin (In re Agape World, Inc.), 633 F. App’x 16, 17 (2d Cir.) (noting that the “prevailing view” among district and bankruptcy courts in the Second Circuit is to treat the payment of interest in Ponzi schemes as fraudu…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of B v. Nelson In fact, “virtually every court to address the question has held that to the extent that investors have received payments in excess of the amounts they have invested, those payments are voidable as fraudulent transfers.” Bayou, 439 B.R. at 337 (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); accord Omnibus Good Faith Decision, 531 B.R. at 462 ; see also Silverman v. Cullin (In re Agape World, Inc.), 633 F. App’x 16, 17 (2d Cir.) (noting that the “prevailing view” among district and bankruptcy courts in the Second Circuit is to treat the payment of interest in Ponzi schemes as fraudu…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sec. Investor Prot. Corp. v. Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC (In re Madoff) See, e.g. , Lowrey II , 596 B.R. at 464 ("where defendants seek rescission and have received full repayment on the principal investment, they have no freestanding interest claim") (quoting Antecedent Debt Decision , 499 B.R. at 422 ); Antecedent Debt Decision , 499 B.R. at 421 n. 4 ; Greiff , 476 B.R. at 725 (ruling that transfers in excess of principal were not "for value" and noting that "every circuit court to address this issue has concluded that an investor's profits from a Ponzi scheme, whether paper profits or actual transfers, are not 'for value' "); Omnibus Good Faith Decision , 531 B…