Capps v. Nw Sign Indus. of North Carolina, Inc., 627 S.E.2d 614 (N.C. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
Capps v. Nw Sign Indus. of North Carolina, Inc., 627 S.E.2d 614 (N.C. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Capps v. NW Sign Industries of North Carolina, Inc. (ncctapp, 2007-11-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Capps v. NW Sign Industries of North Carolina, Inc.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Capps v. NW Sign Indus. of N.C., Inc., 171 N.C.App. 409 , 614 S.E.2d 552 (2005), vacated and remanded, 360 N.C. 391 , 627 S.E.2d 614 (2006).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alan CAPPS
v.
NW SIGN INDUSTRIES OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC., a North Carolina corporation, Ronald Brodie, and Chris Reedel.
No. 383A05..
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Apr 7, 2006.
627 S.E.2d 614
James, McElroy & Diehl, P.A., by Richard B. Fennell and Jared E. Gardner, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellee., Vandeventer Black LLP, by David P. Ferrell and Norman W. Shearin, Jr., Raleigh, for defendant-appellants.
Published
PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissent, the decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded with direction to the Court of Appeals to further remand to the Superior Court of Mecklenburg County for findings of fact sufficient for appellate review of the jurisdictional issue.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Justice MARTIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.