Pearson v. Sterchi Bros. Stores, Inc., 185 So. 2d 170 (Fla. 1966). · Go Syfert
Search
Pearson v. Sterchi Bros. Stores, Inc., 185 So. 2d 170 (Fla. 1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harold F. PEARSON
v.
STERCHI BROTHERS STORES, INC., and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents STERCHI BROTHERS STORES, INC. and Florida Industrial Commission v. Harold F. PEARSON
No. 34521.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 12, 1966.
Published opinion
185 So. 2d 170
Monroe E. McDonald, of Sanders, McEwan, Schwarz & Mims and Edward H. Hurt, Orlando, for .petitioner and cross-respondent., John M. Cain, of Frederick, Cain & Duckworth,’ Orlando, for respondent and cross-petitioner., Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondent.
Caldwell, Connell, Ervin, Thornal, Warren.
Published
PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and briefs and have heard argument by the parties. We find that in entering the order under attack the respondent-commission did not depart from the essential requirements of law. Accordingly, the petition and the cross-petition for writ of certiorari are both denied. The petition for attorneys’ fees is also denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., and WARREN, Circuit Judge, concur.