Fed. Bake Shop v. Unrue, 196 So. 2d 123 (Fla. 1967). · Go Syfert
Search
Fed. Bake Shop v. Unrue, 196 So. 2d 123 (Fla. 1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
FEDERAL BAKE SHOP and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
v.
Valerie UNRUE and the Florida Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Florida.
Mar 8, 1967.
196 So. 2d 123
B. C.'Pyle, of Whittaker, Pyle & Wood, \\"Orlando
Caldwell, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal.
for petitioners.
PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we "have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date No-’ vember 17, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that "there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for allowance of an at•torney’s fee is hereby' granted in the amount of $250.00.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. •