Brooks v. Cent. Truck Lines, Inc., 200 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 1967). · Go Syfert
Brooks v. Cent. Truck Lines, Inc., 200 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eugene BROOKS
v.
CENTRAL TRUCK LINES, INC., Royal Indemnity Company, and the Florida Industrial Commission
No. 36364.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jun 30, 1967.
200 So. 2d 180
Sinclair, Barfield & Louis, Miami, for petitioner., Williams & Jabara, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.
Drew, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal.
Published
PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 7, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The application for attorneys’ fees is also denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.