State v. Dodd, 241 So. 2d 384 (Fla. 1970). · Go Syfert
State v. Dodd, 241 So. 2d 384 (Fla. 1970). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Florida
v.
Sam DODD, Jr.
No. 39584.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec 2, 1970.
241 So. 2d 384
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner., Alton S. Beasley, Stuart, for respondent.
Adkins, Boyd, Drew, Ervin, Roberts.
Published
PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. After argument and upon further consideration, we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued, and it is hereby discharged.

On remand, the case is to be tried anew without prejudice to the State laying proper predicate for the introduction of the Respondent’s alleged confession in conformity with the decision of the District Court. In this connection, we call attention to the case of Williams v. State, Fla.1945, 22 So.2d 821, which sets forth pertinent guidelines for the determination of the voluntariness of an alleged confession.

The writ must be and is discharged and the petition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.