Ralston Purina Co. v. Webb, 310 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). · Go Syfert
Search
Ralston Purina Co. v. Webb, 310 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
RALSTON PURINA COMPANY
v.
Linda WEBB, of the Estate of Wilmont Clyde Webb
No. W-123.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Apr 15, 1975.
310 So. 2d 748
Bevin G. Ritch, Lowry & Ritch, Gaines-ville, for appellant., Ben Daniel, Jr., Ocala, for appellee.
Boyer, McCord, Mills.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal questions the correctness of a summary judgment rendered in favor of appellee.

A careful examination of the record on appeal conclusively establishes the absence of any genuine triable issue of a material fact and that appellee was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, the judgment appealed is

Affirmed.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS, J., concur. McCORD, J., dissents.

Dissent

McCORD

(dissenting).

On Motion for Summary Judgment, all reasonable inferences must be considered in a light most favorable to the party moved against. In my view, there are material issues of fact on the question of whether or not Lester A. Bell, Jr., son-in-law of W. C. Webb and also a salesman for appellant, was acting as Webb’s authorized agent when he incurred the debt here sued upon in Webb’s name. Such precludes the grant of summary judgment and I, therefore, dissent.