Workman v. Workman, 401 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). · Go Syfert
Search
Workman v. Workman, 401 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lee WORKMAN, a/k/a Rose Workman
v.
Peter B. WORKMAN
No. WW-381.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug 11, 1981.
401 So. 2d 1171
1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20704
Carroll L. McCauley, Panama, for appellant., Michael L. Stone, of Marvin A. Urquhart, Jr., P. A., Panama City, for appellee.
Booth, Shaw, Wentworth.
Published
PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from a final judgment of dissolution awarding appellant lump sum, rather than periodic, alimony. We affirm, noting that the Circuit Court has reserved jurisdiction to modify the judgment. Therefore, appellant will be able to apply for further permanent alimony when, for example, the lump sum installment payments terminate, her health worsens, or the husband’s financial circumstances improve. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1201 (Fla.1980); Hyatt v. Hyatt, 315 So.2d 11 (Fla.3d DCA 1975).

BOOTH, SHAW and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.