Gilvin v. State, 429 So. 2d 1355 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Gilvin v. State, 429 So. 2d 1355 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gary Lynn GILVIN
v.
STATE of Florida
No. AI-259.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Apr 21, 1983.
429 So. 2d 1355
1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20735
Gary Lynn Gilvin, pro se., Glenna Joyce Reeves, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant., Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Carolyn M. Snur-kowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Ervin, Nimmons, Wentworth.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
WENTWORTH, Judge.

In this appeal the public defender has filed an Anders1 brief as to appellant’s conviction, but asserts that the trial court erred in retaining jurisdiction over the first one third of appellant’s sentence without stating with particularity the reasons therefor.[2] Appellant has filed a pro se brief asserting several errors, including ineffective assistance of counsel. The alleged sentencing error and those alleged in the pro se brief have not been presented to the lower court, being raised for the first time by this appeal. We therefore decline to address those issues, and affirm the conviction and sentence without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek relief pursuant to Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850. See Williams v. State, 350 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Sawyer v. State, 401 So.2d 939 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

Affirmed.

ERVIN and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
1

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

2

Because we grant no relief, we do not address the procedural issue raised by the inclusion of a sentencing challenge in a so-called “Anders" brief.