State v. Diaz, 440 So. 2d 1318 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Diaz, 440 So. 2d 1318 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The STATE of Florida
v.
Andres DIAZ a/k/a Andy Diaz
No. 83-264.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 1, 1983.
440 So. 2d 1318
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Jack B. Ludin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant., Kent Harrison Robbins, Miami, for appel-lee.
Baskin, Ferguson, Hendry.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

An executive warrant which is regular on its face and complies with the essential requirements for extradition, presents a prima facie showing of the propriety of extradition. See Moore v. State, 407 So.2d 991 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). We reject Diaz’ contention that the necessary documents were facially improper because they contained no express language finding probable cause. The warrant signed by the superior court judge, however, sufficiently established probable cause for extradition. State v. Norman, 362 So.2d 467 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

Reversed and remanded.