Mashburn v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 489 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). · Go Syfert
Search
Mashburn v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 489 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Henry MASHBURN and Margaret Mashburn
v.
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
No. 85-2587.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jun 3, 1986.
489 So. 2d 1194
1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8139
Baron & Budd and Jane N. Saginaw, Dallas, Tex., and Louis S. Robles, Miami, for appellants., Shackleford, Farrior,. Stallings & Evans and Raymond Elligett, Jr. and Charles P. Schropp, Tampa, for appellee.
Ferguson, Nesbitt, Pearson.
Published
PER CURIAM.

The summary judgment in favor of the defendants is reversed on the ground that there exists a genuine issue of fact as to when Mashburn knew or should have known of the facts giving rise to his cause of action. Copeland v. Armstrong Cork Co., 447 So.2d 922 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), affirmed in part, quashed in part, 471 So.2d 533 (Fla.1985).

Reversed.