Rivaldo v. United States, 168 F.3d 505 (11th Cir. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Rivaldo v. United States, 168 F.3d 505 (11th Cir. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 2018–2020 · 2 courts · …a court may refuse to take judicial notice of facts that are irrelevant to the proceeding or (in certain contexts) otherwise excludable under the federal rules. ⚠ not in text
29 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kaplan v. Regions Bank (flmd, 2019-09-25)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Kaplan v. Regions Bank
M.D. Fla. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
a court may refuse to take judicial notice of facts that are irrelevant to the proceeding.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rivaldo
v.
United States
97-5909.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Jan 12, 1999.
168 F.3d 505
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 6177
1999 WL 35193
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 79%
Citer courts: M.D. Florida (1)

168 F.3d 505

Rivaldo
v.
U.S.[*]

NO. 97-5909

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

January 12, 1999

Appeal From: S.D.Fla. No.97-00784-CV-EBD

1

Affirmed.

*

Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 11th Cir.R. 34-3